This post originally appeared in the August issue of Sanitarium Magazine
***
I am
probably not the biggest Nietzsche fanboy that you are ever going to meet, but
I think that a case could be made that I am the biggest Nietzche fanboy currently
writing a column for Sanitarium. One of my favorite ideas from Nietzsche
is the concept of “Eternal return.”
Nietzsche’s
idea was that— as it seemed there was an infinite amount of time in which
events could play out but a finite amount of states in which matter could
exist— all events that could play out would do so and not just once but an
infinite number of times. Though you wouldn’t be conscious of the repetition,
since these others would not truly be you, it nevertheless remains that
throughout eternity there would be an infinite number of people with your name,
and your memories, thinking themselves to be you (and with every
justification), reading this article just as you are doing now.
“Everything
has returned,” Nietzsche said. “Sirius, and the spider, and thy thoughts at
this moment, and this last thought of thine that all things will return.”
Or to
quote Heinrich Heine, who may have been the inspiration for Nietzsche’s idea:
“Time is infinite, but the things in time, the concrete bodies, are finite.
They may indeed disperse into the smallest particles; but these particles, the
atoms, have their determinate numbers, and the numbers of the configurations
which, all of themselves, are formed out of them is also determinate. Now,
however long a time may pass, according to the eternal laws governing the
combinations of this eternal play of repetition, all configurations which have
previously existed on this earth must yet meet, repulse, kiss, and corrupt each
other again.”
This
idea is paralleled by the idea put forward by some cosmologists that, supposing
the universe were infinite and we are not, say, contained in a small bubble of
all the matter in an otherwise empty universe, then there is every reason to
suppose that there are other places in the universe, unimaginably distant from
us, which could not be distinguished from our own world. Purely by chance,
these “Hubble volume clones” would share the same night sky and, even more
rarely, our exact history.
The
response to Eternal Return was Nietzsche’s idea of amor fati or “love of
fate.” This was his “formula for human greatness,” that one would want “to have
nothing different, not forward, not backward, not in all eternity. Not merely
to bear the necessary, still less to conceal it— all idealism is mendaciousness
before the necessary— but to love it.”
That
is to say, if this endless repetition of events cannot be avoided, if your life
with all its wonders and foibles will recur through eternity without end, then
it is a mark of weakness to reject this truth and nothing at all to merely
accept and be resigned to it. In embracing it, and likewise all unpleasant
truths, however— therein is the triumph of humankind.
The Heroine’s Journey
Victoria Lynn Schmidt’s 45 Master Characters
is to my knowledge the best treatment of what she calls the Feminine or
Heroine’s Journey. This isn’t just what you call the Hero’s Journey when your
protagonist is female; it’s a different kind of narrative altogether in which
the protagonist eventually reaches the state of “embodying the willingness to
go it alone and face her own symbolic death.”
It is more introspective than the Hero’s Journey,
but there are two big differences that are especially relevant for our purposes
here.
The first difference is that the hero accumulates
Stuff, like a lightsaber, Force powers, some swanky droids, and military rank.
On the other hand, to quote Jennifer Troemner, “the Heroine’s tools fail her,
or are lost. Her mental and emotional crutches are knocked out from under her.
While the Hero is built up through repeated victory, the Heroine is stripped
bare by repeated defeat [emphasis added].”
The stages of the Heroine’s Journey have names like
Betrayal and Death or, if you look elsewhere, Descent into Death. There’s a
stronger emphasis on the katabasis in this kind of narrative. I would almost
visualize the whole thing as a ritualistic flaying of the being ala the Aztec
deity Xipetotec.
The second difference is that the Heroine’s Journey
is more readily cyclic in nature. It keeps happening. It is more common for a
protagonist, especially a female one, to experience the Heroine’s Journey
multiple times than for a protagonist, especially a male one, to travel the
Hero’s Journey more than once. Hence we see the relevance of Eternal Return.
The Heroine’s Journey may be an ultimately upward
spiral of death and rebirth but it can just as easily be adapted to the
downward, repetitive cycle of an alcoholic, continually tripping on the way to
rebirth and falling back into death. Or maybe nothing truly changes at all and
your protagonist keeps coming back to the same circumstances through either
internal fault of character or unavoidable external conditions.
Realizing xir place in this cycle and xir inability
to stop it, your protagonist must then decide how to react. Is xe crushed beneath
the weight of this “horrifying and paralyzing” idea? Or, when Nietzsche’s demon
says to xem, “This life as you know live it and have lived it, you will have to
live once more and innumerable times more,” does xe look the demon in the eye
and reply, “You are a god and never have I heard anything more divine,” as
Nietzsche described in The Gay Science?
Either is satisfying. Either choice can make for
good horror, depending on whether you wish for its ultimate conclusion to be
depressing or heartening. We’ll talk more on Viktor Frankl at some point in the
future but I will quote him once before we leave: “Everything can be taken from
a man but one thing; the last of the human freedoms— to choose one’s attitude
in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way.”
Viewed this way, the Heroine’s Journey is the
perfect foundation on which to build your horror story, more so than the
Campbell’s Monomyth. It goes hand in hand with existentialism, and if you
choose to play the game straight and end it with rebirth then that’s alright
too.
Horror does not mean nihilism. It
does not mean unremitting despair. It does not in all cases mean, despite what
the name of this column may imply, the endless night that lies in the future of
every star. Because that night will come, and you can write about it if you
want to, but there are also nights right now that don’t last forever, and your
horror story can be about those too.
But whether the light at the end
of the tunnel is the sun or an oncoming train, the Heroine’s Journey is a
narrative adaptable enough to handle it all.
Some recommended reading on the Heroine’s Journey
·
Maureen Murdock’s The Heroine’s
Journey
·
Victoria Lynn Schmidt’s 45 Master
Characters
·
Jennifer Troemner’s A different kind
of plot, at http://tinyurl.com/troemner
·
Flutiebear’s Taking the Heroine’s
Journey, at http://tinyurl.com/flutiebear
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Never heard of this before. Very interesting introduction for me. Definitely will look into your links.
ReplyDelete